As previously promised, I am going to review Trek’s new helmet. I purchased a pink Bontrager Specter helmet. Yes, I get discounts. No, I do not let the discounts affect my opinions on the things I purchase, because like Bontrager shorts, I don’t always like the things I buy.

I am going to compare three helmets. First, the new Bontrager Specter Wavecel, which retails for $150. Second, the Bell Z20 MIPS, which retails for $230. Third, the Giro Cinder MIPS, which retails for $150.

Comfort Winner: Bontrager Specter Wavecel
This actually surprised me. I previously used a rental helmet from the shop where I work and had problems with the fit of the medium, feeling like it was too tight in the forehead, but when I first put on this helmet, I was pleasantly surprised. I felt like the helmet was snug where it should be, and the upgraded BOA dial from the adjustments on the Z20 and Cinder was a nice touch.

Lightest: Bell Z20 MIPS
There isn’t too much of a challenge here. The Z20 is created for the purpose of being light, and in the Tennessee summer heat, it is definitely a big advantage. The Z20 comes in at 303 grams, the Cinder is close at 305 grams, and the Specter is a far third at 341 grams.

Best Protection: It’s a Toss Up
Both the Z20 and Cinder are traditional helmets with added protection for angled impacts from the MIPS system. The Specter has Trek’s Wavecel technology, which is supposed to be a replacement for MIPS, which I have talked a little bit about here. You can also find more information directly from Trek. Based on both the testing from Trek and from independent parties, I am not making any call on the safety of these helmets compared to one another. The most important thing is that you do wear a helmet when you are out riding.

My Choice to Ride: Bell Z20 MIPS or Bontrager Specter Wavecel
I am torn between the two. I find both to be comfortable, and I like the idea of the added protection of the Wavecel, but I feel like I have more ventilation with the Z20 and a lighter helmet, which is nice for the summers here. Another important note is that on the Specter, there is nowhere to put your sunglasses on top of it, which has been mentioned many places. If I saw extremely concrete evidence that one helmet was safer than the other, my opinion may change in the future, but for now I am going to just go with the helmet I feel like using.

As for my overall opinion on the Specter, I think it is a good helmet. It is comfortable, and the lowest price point of the Wavecel helmets at the moment. I would like to see more Wavecel options, like a $100 price point or lower, as well as youth options. There are a couple things I think are missing with the Wavecel options at the moment as well. I would really like to see a road helmet with more ventilation on it, because looking at the XXX I don’t think there is enough compared to my Z20. I also noticed it is not possible to put sunglasses on the helmet when not wearing them, and as a coworker pointed out, he couldn’t scratch his head through it.

In the future I will continue to ride it, although the temperature has risen quickly in Nashville, so tonight I am going to be using my Z20 for my group ride. I can’t be a full Trek ad all the time.

As many people anxiously awaited Trek’s announcement of how they were going to change cycling on March 19, I found out on the 16 from my B2B site at work. Can I say I was just a little disappointed it wasn’t a graphene Domane? Absolutely. Can I say I am disappointed in the announcement as a whole? No.

Trek has a major point that the biggest recent change in helmets has been MIPS, which is a slip liner designed to absorb energy from an angular impact, since the material of the helmet only absorbs energy from a direct impact. Their goal with the development of the new WaveCel technology is to have one material that is going to do both. It protects from both angular and direct impacts without the need of MIPS.

Now, before I become a Trek ad, I will point out that obviously not everyone has the money for a WaveCel helmet, and I am not going into the technology, because you can read that from Trek. The XXX and Blaze, their road and mountain bike helmets, are priced at $300, while the Specter and Charge, their all around and commuter helmets, are priced at $150. I get plenty of customers who prefer to spend $40, no matter what I pitch about the benefits of a higher priced helmet, and I understand not everyone wants to spend $100+, so what I hope to see in the future is Trek allowing this technology to trickle down into their other helmets so everyone can benefit from the added safety.

It is no longer just weight and MIPS making the difference. Instead we can honestly say that yes, based on studies this helmet is safer. Trek has definitely put money into making sure people are safe on the road. Their lineup of daytime running lights and focus on placing attention grabbing colors where people are most likely to see them on your body pairs nicely with the launch of this new helmet.

Do I think this was a little overhyped? Maybe. I think that is more just me wishing for a graphene Domane right now. I am going to be purchasing one of the helmets. Specifically, I will be purchasing the Specter.

Why the Specter and not XXX? For one, I would love to get the limited edition XXX, and I can afford it with my employee discount, but I have a really nice Bell helmet with MIPS that I love, and I don’t know if I will love the fit of a Bontrager helmet. I also would like to match my cyclocross bike in the fall and the bright pink will look amazing with it. Finally, it is cheaper, and I would like to give honest feedback of a middle of the road product, because based on my newest cycling shoes, people can tell I am a gear snob.

in addition to my purchase, I am going to be giving an honest full review of the Specter, comparing it to my Bell Z20 and Giro Cinder to give a better idea of fit with a blog post and video to go along with it.